Sterling silver jewelry, handmade beaded jewelry, and accessories
Athletes are lying to us. They are lying and believe their is situated. Well, almost all of us do. The thing is, many Athletes that test positive for restricted substances are blaming dietary supplements because the cause for the positive test. Allows examine the following statement from Iowa State linebacker Matt Robertson who was recently kicked off the Iowa state football team for testing positive for a banned substance.
"I take full responsibility for taking an over-the-counter health supplement that is banned by the NCAA, " Robertson said in a declaration released Monday. "I was paying a heavy price for a very bad decision, as I will never again wear an Iowa State uniform. I hope my example will serve as a warning to others contemplating use of nutritional supplements. "
Statements like these are leading to an unnecessary hysteria amidst lots of people regarding dietary supplements. Inside Mr. Robertson's quote, Stanozolol Cycle specifically notice the term "dietary supplements". Health supplement is a very broad term, it addresses literally thousands of different types of products. Right now there is merely one kind of health supplement that will cause a positive result for steroid tests. These products are called pro-hormones. Did a pro-hormone cause Mr. Robertson's positive result? Possibly, but we will never know the truth.
Pro-hormones are being used to raise the body's testosterone levels, just like steroids, but at a much lesser effect. Virtually any athlete who requires a pro-hormone knows what it does. They already know pro-hormones are designed to elevate testosterone producing it more muscle mass and greater athletic performance. Upon top of that, pro-hormones say right on the jar something to the impact of "Professional and novice athletes subject to performance improving substance testing should check with with their sanctioning body before using this product as use of such might cause a reactive drug test. " Pretty clear isn't it? A person can't tell me that Mr. Robertson can't read, he is "an academic all-Big 12 performer who was nearly as good in the classroom as he was on the field, " according to his trainer Dan McCarney.
Blaming a positive test on one of these products may be true because they can result in a positive on a steroid test. However, it would also be very easy to blame a positive test over a dietary product when they athlete was actually by using a steroid. Since the actual supplements are rarely revealed, it is simple to blame a positive test on a dietary supplement.
Keep in mind that make a difference because a positive test is a positive test, right? Wrong. By these sports athletes blaming their positive test on dietary supplements rather than steroids they are in effect "passing the buck" That is, they are claiming ignorance, rather than taking responsibility, and they are hurting the multi-billion buck dietary supplement industry at the same time. This is not ok, not only because it creates false beliefs among the list of public about supplements, but additionally because it gives the government government grounds to further restrict what you can buy without a prescription.
Would you like to have to go to your doctor to get a prescription for a multi-vitamin? What if you desired to buy a proteins supplement? Would you want to have to attend your doctor for that? I didn't think so. These kinds of athletes and their organizations are being extremely irresponsible by using broad conditions like dietary supplements when describing positive drug assessments.
The NCAA and other governing organizations should need to reveal what exact substance these athletes are tests positive for. By not doing so these organizations are allowing athletes to save face at the expense of an entire multi-billion dollar industry. By forcing the NCAA and other governing bodies to name the precise substance that was analyzed positive for they would eliminate all confusion on what is and it is not the cause of positive tests. Either that or governing bodies including the NCAA and the press should be educated in the proper terminology of the dietary supplement industry. Painting reactive tests with the term "dietary supplements" is inaccurate, unfair and irresponsible.
Take for example Rafael Palmeiro, everyone recalls his overly compelling funds hill testimony. How sarcastic that only a couple of weeks later Rafael tested positive for Stanozolol, a steroid. Palmeiro tried hard to pass the blame. He held accountable "tainted" dietary supplements, and when that didn't take flight he blamed a vitamin B12 shot. Well stanozol is a very specific and popular steroid. Presently there is no possible way that a positive for stanazolol can be from health supplements or B12. After people started realizing this, Palmeiro started claiming lack of knowledge, saying that he never knowingly took steroids. Well I actually guess Rafael will be making a good living after baseball considering he or she is the only person on the planet that knows where to find pills that jump off the stand into your mouth on their own. What a cool idea, the little blue pill could be come the little blue jumping pill. That would be neat to see.