Sterling silver jewelry, handmade beaded jewelry, and accessories
"Everyone wants to comprehend art. You will want to attempt to understand the song of a bird?...people who try to describe pictures are often barking up the incorrect tree." - Pablo Picasso
What Picasso says about understanding art is extremely relevant to exactly how we approach abstract paintings. Lots of people believe that abstract paintings should have a particular meaning of some kind, which may be clearly understood and articulated if only they knew how. best abstract artists This misconception isn't helped by the endless method of getting people ready to spout nonsense by what they believe the artist was attempting to say. The almost inevitable consequence of this example is that people can either feel as though they're being excluded from sharing in some secret knowledge, or alternatively conclude that abstract painting is in fact all a sham. Either way, the end result is that lots of people do not feel well-disposed towards modern art or abstract paintings.
I certainly identify with Picasso's remark as far as my very own paintings are concerned. If I'd a specific message or even a meaning that I really could articulate in words, then I would articulate it in words - the painting would have no purpose. The complete point of making an abstract painting is that it embodies a thing that only it can, in a way that cannot be placed into words. It's not an article it is just a painting - it encompasses and expresses things in a language that is exclusive to the medium of paint. That is why we should not attempt to'understand'abstract paintings in the manner people sometimes feel they should be able to.
The viewer shouldn't locate a clear narrative in an abstract painting - it is not going to tell a tale, or make reference to an additional'subject'in the same way a figurative painting will. But that will not mean there is no meaning or no subject, or that abstract paintings cannot communicate with and move people. When asked about subject matter, the Abstract Expressionist artist Jackson Pollock said, "I am the topic ".Pollock's statement is not just true, it's inevitable.
The experiences, personality, memories and mood of the abstract artist cannot help but be fed in to the painting if the artist approaches the job within an open and honest way. I really do not need an external subject or idea before I can cause a painting - I merely begin. The truth that I am me and no-one else is what makes my work dissimilar to anyone else's, and the same is true of all artists. The colours I choose, the marks a make, the accidents I decide to leave, or to obliterate, they are all issues that I choose due to who I am.
If you were to present a number of different artists with the exact same basic design on a fabric and inquire further to pick up a comb and develop the painting, the differences in what they'd choose to complete could be enormous. I've watched other abstract artists at focus on paintings and thought "I would not in a million years have chosen that colour and put it there." Not because I believe it is wrong or bad, but since they are who they're and (to quote that other leading artist, Morrisey!) "only I'm I "