Sterling silver jewelry, handmade beaded jewelry, and accessories
Webster defines abstract as: a.considered apart from a particular instance, b.expressing an excellent in addition to the object or c. having only intrinsic form with little or no pictorial representation. Put simply; taking a thing and concentrating on its core fundamentalness. All three definitions very easily fit abstract painting in showing, telling, drawing and painting the essence of the thing without actually depicting the thing itself.
So how exactly does an abstract painter arrive at an abstract design? Many stated which they started with a representational motif, that the motif was something readily identifiable. Then they dissected the motif so to speak, searching for the bare bones, ab muscles essence of the object. They expressed this essence with colorful shapes, some beautiful, some drab, and some just plain ugly.
In almost any painting the artist is making a statement. It's easy to state pretty pink flowers in a representational painting. What the abstract artist has to say must certanly be said with his/her simple means; brush marks, color and interesting shapes. Also, since color is arbitrary, color are at the artist's whim, and may or may not be pretty and has nothing regarding the painting's success.
To make a meaningful statement with no recognizable subject is daunting. It's not just a matter of simply looking and drawing. He/she must use almost all their wiles to engage us in dialog with their art, being limited, or we should say, unlimited, with unrecognizable shapes and unrelated (to the object) color. The artist must interest and speak to the viewer through form and color.
A weak, wishy washy, pretty pink flower painting says, "Weak, wishy washy pretty pink flowers!" Bright, bold colors, without form and substance within an abstract painting says, "No form and no substance!" Neither painting is successful.
So..... here we stand in front of the artwork, having no knowledge of abstract art, its purpose and intention. We wish to respond but we are with no clue. So, we hesitate facing the art work, we don't understand what to state, we don't react to the color or design, so, we leave saying, or at the very least thinking, "That artist must certanly be nuts!" And wondering what the painting was all about. commission artwork online The thing that was its purpose? Was it good art or not?
There are several folks who are of the opinion that a painting must be representational to be good art. And if they cannot see every hair on the pinnacle and every leaf on the tree, then your art isn't good. That simply is not true. You may choose the see every hair but that is certainly not a sign of good art.
What guidelines do we've in judging abstract paintings merits? The guidelines that representational painters must follow are the exact same for the abstract painter. The work should have readable values, color harmony and dominance, repetition with variety in shapes, colors and lines, all that concerns good art must take abstract art.
An accumulation wild colors and shapes does not always soon add up to good art in abstraction or representational art. A great abstract can be more difficult to display than representational art since the artist is relying on his imagination and intuition to make something meaningful and of value. (not necessarily monetary value)
In trying to understand abstract (non-representational) art, approach it with the concept in mind to simply appreciate what's before you. Sometimes the title can give us a clue in regards to what the painting is about. That helps. Then look and take note of how it affects you.
Does the colour speak for you? Are you currently lifted up or cast down by the color? You could have some reaction to a bit of art work, it will move you for some reason, perhaps little, perhaps a good deal. Identify what it is. Good art, whether abstract or representational, sets a mood, tells an account, howeve